teatea-pension/.trellis/spec/backend/drizzle-postgres-current.md

Drizzle PostgreSQL Current Persistence Contract

Scenario: Current Project After PostgreSQL Migration

1. Scope / Trigger

• Trigger: implementing or modifying auth, RBAC, audit, elder, facility, admission, organization, settings, or dashboard data flows in this repository.
• Applies because this project already has drizzle-orm, postgres, Drizzle migrations under drizzle/, and schema definitions under modules/core/server/schema.ts.
• This supersedes local JSON persistence for current feature work. Local JSON guidance is only historical or for projects that have not adopted Drizzle yet.

2. Signatures

• getDatabase(): AppDatabase
• checkDatabaseConnection(): Promise<{ ok: boolean; reason: string }>
• readData(): Promise<AppData>
• recordAuditLog(input: AuditInput): Promise<AuditLog>
• requirePermission(permission: Permission, auditContext: DeniedAuditContext): Promise<PermissionCheckSuccess | PermissionCheckFailure>
• Route Handlers use standard GET, POST, PATCH, and DELETE exports and return Response.

3. Contracts

• Environment key: DATABASE_URL is required for database-backed runtime behavior.
• Drizzle source of truth: modules/core/server/schema.ts.
• Migration output: drizzle/.
• Database config: drizzle.config.ts.
• Session cookie:
  • Name: teatea_session
  • Flags: httpOnly, sameSite: "lax", path: "/"
  • Lifetime: 7 days
• API response shape:

type ApiResult<T extends Record<string, unknown>> =
  | ({ success: true; reason: string } & T)
  | { success: false; reason: string };

• modules/core/server/store.ts is a compatibility read model:
  • readData() may aggregate Drizzle rows for existing pages.
  • writeData() and updateData() must remain unavailable after migration.
  • New mutation code must use Drizzle queries or transactions.

4. Validation & Error Matrix

• Missing DATABASE_URL -> throw during getDatabase() and surface a clear database configuration failure.
• Missing/expired session -> 401 with { success: false, reason: "未登录或会话已过期" }.
• Missing permission -> 403 with { success: false, reason: "权限不足" } and a denied audit log.
• Invalid JSON body -> 400 with a Chinese user-facing reason.
• Missing record by ID -> 404 with { success: false, reason: "<entity>不存在" }.
• Duplicate account email -> 409 with { success: false, reason: "账号已存在" }.
• Bed/admission conflict -> structured failure response and no partial mutation.

5. Good/Base/Bad Cases

• Good: UI submits to a Route Handler, the handler validates input, calls requirePermission, mutates Drizzle tables in a transaction when multiple tables are involved, records audit, and returns ApiResult.
• Base: Server Component reads data directly through focused server helpers or the temporary readData() compatibility model.
• Bad: New mutation code calls writeData() or updateData().
• Bad: New code treats .data/teatea.json as the active persistence layer.
• Bad: API auth is enforced only by hidden UI controls.

6. Tests Required

• pnpm lint
• pnpm type-check
• pnpm build
• When schema changes are made: pnpm db:generate, then review generated SQL and run pnpm db:migrate against the configured development database.
• Manual or automated integration assertions:
  • first setup creates platform admin, organization, organization roles, membership, and cookie session
  • protected app route redirects without cookie
  • protected app route renders with a valid cookie
  • CRUD mutation persists across reload/API list
  • denied permission returns 403 and writes an audit log
  • admission mutation updates admissions, beds, and elders consistently

7. Wrong vs Correct

Wrong

await updateData((data) => {
  data.beds.push(newBed);
});

Correct

const database = getDatabase();
await database.insert(beds).values({
  organizationId,
  roomId,
  code,
  status: "available",
});

Wrong

await database.insert(admissions).values({ organizationId, elderId, bedId });
await database.update(beds).set({ status: "occupied" }).where(eq(beds.id, bedId));

Correct

await database.transaction(async (transaction) => {
  await transaction.insert(admissions).values({ organizationId, elderId, bedId });
  await transaction.update(beds).set({ status: "occupied" }).where(eq(beds.id, bedId));
  await transaction.update(elders).set({ status: "active" }).where(eq(elders.id, elderId));
});

Scenario: Facility Room Creation Without Fabricated Hierarchy

1. Scope / Trigger

• Trigger: changing facility room creation APIs or any UI that creates rooms.
• Applies because rooms.floorId is required by schema, but the system must not create fake campus/building/floor records to satisfy that foreign key.

2. Signatures

• POST /api/facilities/rooms
• Request: { name: string; code: string; floorId: string; capacity?: number }
• Response: ApiResult<{ room: typeof rooms.$inferSelect }>

3. Contracts

• floorId must refer to an existing floors.id in the authenticated active organization.
• capacity is optional; omitted means schema/product default 1.
• If capacity is supplied, it must be a positive integer.
• The handler may insert only the rooms row. It must not insert campuses, buildings, or floors as placeholder hierarchy.

4. Validation & Error Matrix

• Missing active organization -> 400 / 请选择机构后维护房间.
• Missing name, code, or floorId -> 400 / 房间名称、编号和楼层不能为空.
• Invalid supplied capacity -> 400 / 房间容量需为正整数.
• floorId not found in active organization -> 404 / 楼层不存在.
• Insert returning no row -> 500 / 房间创建失败.

5. Good/Base/Bad Cases

• Good: create UI first exposes real campus/building/floor selection, then submits the selected floorId.
• Base: if facility hierarchy management is not exposed yet, keep room creation UI hidden or disabled.
• Bad: auto-create "默认院区", "默认楼栋", or "默认楼层" inside the room API.

6. Tests Required

• pnpm lint
• pnpm type-check
• pnpm build
• Integration assertions:
  • missing floorId returns 400
  • unknown or cross-organization floorId returns 404
  • valid floorId creates a room without inserting campus/building/floor rows

7. Wrong vs Correct

Wrong

const floor = existingFloor ?? await transaction.insert(floors).values({ name: "默认楼层" }).returning();
await transaction.insert(rooms).values({ floorId: floor.id, name, code });

Correct

const floorRows = await database
  .select({ id: floors.id })
  .from(floors)
  .where(and(eq(floors.id, floorId), eq(floors.organizationId, organizationId)))
  .limit(1);
const floor = floorRows[0];
if (!floor) {
  return jsonFailure("楼层不存在", 404);
}
await database.insert(rooms).values({ organizationId, floorId: floor.id, name, code });

Scenario: Health Admin Data Management

1. Scope / Trigger

• Trigger: adding or changing health profile, vital record, chronic condition, or health anomaly review behavior.
• Applies because health data is persisted in Drizzle tables and rendered through a settings management page, not fabricated in the operational /app/health placeholder.

2. Signatures

• GET /api/health/admin
• PUT /api/health/profiles/[elderId]
• POST /api/health/vitals
• POST /api/health/chronic-conditions
• PATCH /api/health/reviews/[id]
• listHealthAdminData(organizationId: string): Promise<HealthAdminData>
• Mutations return either the domain DTO or { success: false; reason: string; status: number }.

3. Contracts

• Health APIs must call requirePermission before reading or mutating:
  • reads use health:read
  • mutations use health:manage
• All health rows are scoped by organizationId.
• Elder-owned health mutations must validate the elder exists in the active organization.
• GET /api/health/admin returns { success: true; reason: string; data: HealthAdminData }; client refresh code must read result.data.
• Mutation success responses follow the standard shape:
  • profile: { success: true; reason: string; profile }
  • vital: { success: true; reason: string; vital; review? }
  • chronic condition: { success: true; reason: string; condition }
  • review: { success: true; reason: string; review }
• Mutations must write audit logs after successful persistence.

4. Validation & Error Matrix

• Missing active organization -> 400 with a Chinese reason instructing the user to select an organization.
• Missing elderId for vital/condition -> 400.
• Invalid date/source/status/numeric field -> 400.
• Elder not found or belongs to another organization -> 404 / 老人档案不存在.
• Review not found or belongs to another organization -> 404 / 异常复核记录不存在.
• Missing permission -> 403 from requirePermission; route must not call domain helpers.
• Insert/update returning no row -> 500 mutation failure.

5. Good/Base/Bad Cases

• Good: keep /app/settings/health as the backend management surface and leave /app/health operational until real operational data exists.
• Good: return the admin payload under a data key so route output and client refresh types match.
• Good: seed demo health rows only inside the default workspace seeding transaction and tie them to real seeded elders.
• Base: anomaly review rows may be created automatically from MVP vital thresholds.
• Bad: render UI-only health records or counters on static module pages.
• Bad: hide mutation buttons in the UI without enforcing health:manage in the Route Handler.
• Bad: update reviews by id alone without also filtering by active organizationId.

6. Tests Required

• pnpm test with API assertions for each health route.
• Route tests must cover at least: happy path, permission denial, missing active organization, invalid input, and missing/cross-organization IDs.
• pnpm db:generate after schema changes, then review the generated SQL for only additive health enum/table/index/FK changes.
• pnpm lint, pnpm type-check, and pnpm build.

7. Wrong vs Correct

Wrong

const data = await listHealthAdminData(organizationId);
return jsonSuccess("健康数据已加载", data);

Correct

const data = await listHealthAdminData(organizationId);
return jsonSuccess("健康数据已加载", { data });

Wrong

await database.update(healthAnomalyReviews).set({ status }).where(eq(healthAnomalyReviews.id, id));

Correct

await database
  .update(healthAnomalyReviews)
  .set({ status, updatedAt: new Date() })
  .where(and(eq(healthAnomalyReviews.id, id), eq(healthAnomalyReviews.organizationId, organizationId)));